Categories
Compliance

Say Goodbye to Disparate Impact Theory

Dave Gibbs Training Manager EFG Companies
Contributing Author:
Dave Gibbs
Training Manager
EFG Companies

On Monday, President Donald J. Trump signed into law the Congressional S.J. 57 resolution repealing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) guidance on dealer markup. Originally issued in March, 2013, the auto lending guidance quickly received negative feedback. In fact, the ruling caused several finance sources to either switch to a flat-fee compensation model or enforce lower caps on dealer markups. The ruling also prompted the CFPB to impose consent orders with several institutions resulting in millions of dollars in fines.

The retail automotive industry is cheering this move, which began five months ago when the Government Accountability Office said Congress had the power under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to overturn the CFPB guidance. But, before you start thinking the good old days are back, consider what started the industry on this path.

The CFPB’s original guidance was designed to inform lenders that it would begin enforcing the fair lending requirements of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) using a theory on disparate impact. This theory refers to practices that adversely affect protected classes of individuals, even though employer rules and practices are meant to be neutral. The CFPB used this theory to make the argument that dealer markup practices could result in unintentional discrimination during the credit process, and must therefore be reined in.

While the CFPB can no longer use disparate impact theory to force lenders to reduce dealer markup, the ECOA and its fair lending requirements remain in full effect. Other federal, state and local compliance regulations also remain, which prompts me to remind our clients that remaining in compliance is still in the dealership’s best interest. And, it’s highly unlikely that lenders who invested millions of dollars into comprehensive compliance platforms will suddenly reverse all those process changes.

Categories
Compliance

2017 CFPB Round Up

Contributing Author: Steve Roennau Vice President Compliance EFG Companies
Contributing Author:
Steve Roennau
Vice President
Compliance
EFG Companies

In January of this year, President Trump issued an Executive Order which required agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to re-address how they issue new regulations. The order required agencies to eliminate two regulations each time they issue a new one. Because of this, we saw very little activity coming out of the bureau on issuing new regulations.

In addition, criticism of the CFPB reached a tipping point, forcing politicians to take a hard look at the powers granted the bureau. A good example of this is the Arbitration Rule that the CFPB tried to force through Congress in the third quarter. While the rule initially passed Congress, it was nullified by President Trump in November.

The latest news surrounding the bureau focuses on the change of leadership, as Richard Cordray stepped down from the position of Director. With the CFPB embroiled in internal politics, we can expect another year of limited activity. This is all great news for the automotive industry. However, it does not mean that the auto finance environment will return to the golden age of the 1980s. From an auto lender standpoint, it is no longer fiscally sound for them to undo compliance practices that are years in the making.

So what’s the plan for 2018? Essentially, stay the course! Ensure all your processes are documented. Documenting your processes does not have to cost thousands of dollars in attorney fees and man hours. In fact, it can be as simple as taking a process, like insurance verification, and writing down the steps your team takes to complete that process. You don’t need legal language. And, each process doesn’t need to be a 20-page document. It’s just writing down what you already do every day.

Categories
Compliance

CFPB Upheaval

Contributing Author: Steve Roennau Vice President Compliance EFG Companies
Contributing Author:
Steve Roennau
Vice President
Compliance
EFG Companies

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) had a busy first quarter of 2017 defending itself. In Q4 of 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled the CFPB “unconstitutionally structured”. In Q1 of this year, the CFPB began the appeal process and it’s not looking too good for them.

Among those supporting the unconstitutional ruling are:

  • The Department of Justice (DOJ)
  • 15 state Attorneys General
  • American Financial Services Association (AFSA)

The DOJ stated that the ruling should be upheld in its entirety, including the remedy to give President Trump full authority to remove the CFPB’s director at will. In addition, the AFSA submitted a list of other suggested regulatory reforms for the CFPB to the Trump administration.

While the CFPB has been granted a rehearing of the initial case that determined the unconstitutional ruling, the regulatory agency has still had its powers significantly curbed, specifically in the case of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.