Categories
Compliance

The Current Climate for Regulatory Compliance

The retail automotive market has found itself in an interesting situation. On one hand, retail sales are rebounding nicely, with strong price pressure coupled with continued low interest rates. On the other hand, all signs are pointing to an increased environment for regulatory scrutiny from an  hyper-focused Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and various local officials.

New leadership within the CFPB has signaled through their rulemaking agenda that automotive lending practices will garner increased scrutiny. New legislative bodies within state and local governments in many areas have followed suit to respond to discriminatory lending practices and perceived predatory consumer behavior.

Couple this renewed regulatory interest and sales environment, with a host of new fraud and cybersecurity schemes that can trip up any company, no matter how big, and the situation gets even more convoluted.

Categories
Compliance Economy Industry Trends

Skipping Steps Is Never a Good Idea

While the country is still in the grips of the pandemic, sales of new and used vehicles showed signs of life in May and June with big pickup trucks leading the way. For the quarter, analysts predict that car sales were off about one-third from 2019 levels, thanks in large part to plant shutdowns and shelter-in-place restrictions imposed in March and April. The economic stimulus CARES and PPP programs, along with enhanced state-level unemployment benefits, provided a bit of a boost in May, prompting consumers to consider purchasing a vehicle. Low interest rates and OEM incentives sweetened the deal. Savvy dealerships who pivoted to online and digital sales were able to capture the bulk of the upswing in June.

Q3 results hinge on several factors. Pandemic hot spots across the country could prompt local governments to return to some level of shutdown. Whether or not Congress provides a second round of stimulus could also have a dramatic impact on consumer confidence. And the U.S. unemployment rate could put a notable damper on both new and used vehicle sales.

Also, let’s not forget inventory concerns. Factories that shut down in March and April are just beginning to ramp up. There will be a noticeable delay in restarting the parts supply chain as well. Areas of the country that experienced strong sales in May and June could be faced with slim pickings on their lots.

But there is another – somewhat hidden – concern. Identity fraud has reared its ugly head. While fraud has always been an area of focus and concern in the retail automotive world, a couple of unique pandemic situations have exacerbated the situation.

Categories
Compliance

DOD Reverses Course on MLA Interpretation

Contributing Author: Steve Roennau Vice President Compliance EFG Companies
Contributing Author:
Steve Roennau
Vice President
EFG Companies

In February, the Department of Defense (DOD) issued a statement regarding its interpretation of
the Military Lending Act (MLA). According to a filing in the Federal Register,

“The Department of Defense (Department) is amending its interpretive rule for the
Military Lending Act (the MLA). The MLA, as implemented by the Department, limits the military annual percentage rate (MAPR) that a creditor may charge to a maximum of 36 percent, requires certain disclosures, and provides other substantive consumer protections on “consumer credit” extended to Service members and their families. The Department is now withdrawing the amended question and answer number 2 (Q&A #2), published in the December 14, 2017 Interpretive Rule, which discussed when credit is extended for the purpose of purchasing a motor vehicle or personal property and the creditor simultaneously extends credit in an amount greater than the purchase price of the motor vehicle or personal property.” – federalregister.gov/d/2020-04041

This statement follows a joint petition, filed in January 2018 by the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) and the American Financial Services Association (AFSA), requesting the DOD to review the interpretation. When the DOD issued its 2017 interpretation, there was no public notice or opportunity for the NADA and other retail automotive trade associations to comment on the implications.